(1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Comparisons are common, and it is nothing different in the cybersecurity world. One such technology is hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP). This is why there is a constant tug-of-war of HTTP 2 vs HTTP 1. But even before HTTP 1.1 or HTTP 2 came into existence, there was HTTP. However, as the Internet evolved and became more complex, the need for development came with it.
What limited the existing HTTP is the lack of support for persistent connections, thus resulting in increased latency and decreased performance. Due to all these reasons, HTTP 1.1 came into development and became the standard for HTTP communication on the web.
So to understand HTTP 2 vs HTTP 1.1 better, let us first get into the details of each. Let’s start with HTTP 1.1.
Officially standardized in 1999, HTTP 1.1 is the most recent version of HTTP. Just like its predecessor, this application protocol transfers data between web servers and clients. However, what makes it different is the incorporation of PUT, DELETE, and OPTIONS, and it includes features like HTTP pipelining and the chunked transfer encoding. Due to all these features, HTTP 1.1 provides better performance and more flexibility than HTTP 1.
There are several benefits of HTTP 1.1 compared to the earlier version HTTP 1.0.
As technology became more evolved, HTTP 2 was developed. It addressed some of the limitations and inefficiencies of HTTP 1.1.
Moving forward with HTTP 1.1 vs 2.0, let’s now discuss HTTP 2.
HTTP 2 is the second major version of the HTTP network protocol used for transmitting data over the Internet. It was developed to improve the performance and efficiency of web applications by reducing the amount of data sent over the wire. This reduces the number of round trips required to load a webpage and allows for a more efficient application of resources.
But why is http 2.0 vs. 1.1 a debated topic, and what makes the former more efficient than its previous version?
As the technology developed and the Internet evolved, HTTP 1.1 soon became outdated. This was the reason why HTTP 2 was developed. However, some other reasons include the following:
In HTTP 1.1, each request and response was sent over a separate connection. For each request, a new connection had to be established, resulting in a high number of round trips required to load a webpage. HTTP 2 came with multiplexing of requests.
HTTP 1.1 did not have built-in support for header compression, so headers were sent in plain text, which meant that they took up a significant amount of bandwidth. As a result, while sending large numbers of headers or when sending headers over slow connections, problems were faced.
These are the major reasons why HTTP 1.1 was replaced. However, there are other differences between the two versions. So first, let us compare both of them.
These are some of the parameters based on which we will compare both the HTTP versions.
In HTTP/1.1, the client-server initiates all requests for resources such as images, stylesheets, and scripts. The server can only respond to requests that it receives. This means that the client must first request the HTML of a web page, parse it, and then make additional requests for any additional resources it needs to render the page. This results in delayed page load times.
Contrary to this, HTTP 2 allows for server push, so the server proactively pushes resources to the client without the client needing to request them. This speeds up page load times as the client starts processing and rendering resources as soon as they are received.
In HTTP 1.1, a buffer overflow can occur when a client sends a request with a header that is larger than the server’s buffer size. This can cause the server to crash or become unresponsive. To prevent buffer overflow, servers typically have a maximum buffer size for incoming requests and reject any requests exceeding this limit.
HTTP 2, on the other hand, uses a more sophisticated approach to prevent buffer overflow. It uses a flow control mechanism that allows the server to send data to the client in small chunks rather than sending all the data at once.
HTTP 2 supports multiplexing, allowing multiple requests and responses to be sent over a single connection simultaneously. This helps to reduce the latency and increase the overall performance of the connection. In contrast, HTTP 1.1 uses a separate connection for each request and response, resulting in increased latency and reduced performance.
HTTP 1.1 uses plain text to encode and transmit data. Though it is easy for humans to read and understand the data, it can be less efficient than a binary protocol.
HTTP 2 uses a series of binary codes to encode and transmit data rather than plain text. Binary protocols are generally more efficient than text-based protocols because they can transmit data more compactly.
|HTTP 1.1||HTTP 2|
|Development||It was developed in the year 1997||It was developed in the year 2015.|
|Compression||It compresses data by itself.||It uses HPACK for data compression.|
|Binary Protocol||A text-based protocol uses plain text to encode and transmit data.||It works on the binary protocol as a series of binary codes encode and transmit data rather than plain text.|
|Security||The client sends a request to a server, and the server sends a response back to the client.||A different underlying protocol called Secure Remote Protocol 2 (SRP2) establishes a secure connection between a client and a server.|
|Multiplexing||A separate connection is established for each request and response, which can add overhead and latency to the communication process.||It allows multiplexing so multiple requests and responses can be sent over a single connection.|
|Buffer Overflow||HTTP 1.1 cannot handle buffer overflow vulnerabilities due to the lack of sufficient measures.||HTTP 2 includes measures to prevent buffer overflow vulnerabilities.|
|Performance||HTTP 1.1 does not include any in-built features, so the performance it delivers is less efficient.||HTTP 2 is designed to be more efficient and performant than HTTP 1.1. This is because HTTP 2 includes several features like multiplexing, binary protocol and header compression.|
Most modern web browsers support HTTP 1.1 and HTTP 2 including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Microsoft Edge, and Opera.
However, the HTTP version might vary based on the version of the browser, and some older versions may not support it. So it all comes down to the operating system, as well as the specific configuration of the browser.
To move to HTTP 2, you can do the following:
This is how you can move from HTTP 1.1 to HTTP 2.
Read also about HTTP Vs. HTTPS Differences and Performance
HTTP is the backbone of the internet and enables the creation and sharing of various types of information and resources. Without HTTP, the internet would not be able to function in the way that it does today. However, with time HTTP versions kept changing.
We hope the HTTP 2.0 vs. 1.1 comparison helps you understand the HTTP versions.