What Is the HTTP/2 Protocol? Difference Between HTTP/1.1 vs HTTP/2 vs HTTP/3

What Is the HTTP/2 Protocol? 

HTTP/2 is the second major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used by the World Wide Web. It’s the product of the Internet Engineering Task Force. Officially, it was published as RFC 7540 in May 2015.

An evolutionary improvement to HTTP/1.1, a protocol serving since 1997 as a workhorse for communication between computers over the internet-it was actually based upon an early draft of the experimental SPDY protocol developed by Google.

Key Features of HTTP/2

Binary Protocol

A big distinguishing factor between HTTP/2 and its predecessors is that it was formerly a text-based protocol before being transformed into a binary protocol.

The interactions of an HTTP/1.1 always existed between a client and server over plain text, which, although human-readable, introduced a number of inefficiencies in parsing and data processing.

This binary format in HTTP/2 helps in the handling of data, which in turn makes computations efficient.

The nature of the Binary Streamlines protocol architecture decreases the complexity involved in message interpretation and notably quickens communication rates between clients and servers.

The shift to a binary protocol also reduces the chances for errors while the data is in transit, making data exchanges more reliable and secure.

Multiplexing

We can consider Multiplexing one of the revolutionary features of HTTP/2, responding to a major limitation of HTTP/1.1. This could be achieved because in HTTP/1.1, each request/response pair went serially over a single TCP connection.

Also Read: HTTP 1 Vs. HTTP 1.1 Vs. HTTP 2: Key Differences

That is, other requests had to wait until the current request was fully responded to. Because of this, so many inefficiencies arise on pages containing many assets, say images and scripts, put together with stylesheets.

HTTP/2 allows multiple requests and responses to go through over a single connection without waiting for others to finish.

This feature greatly reduces latency, optimizes the load times of pages, and enhances general performance for web applications containing complex and heavy pages.

Header Compression (HPACK)

In the case of HTTP/1.1, all HTTP headers are transmitted without compression; this generally results in a significant amount of redundant data being transferred, especially with modern web applications that often involve numerous and large headers.

HTTP/2 uses header compression based on the algorithm known as HPACK. The usage of this technology is to compress header data before sending over the network, hence decreasing the sent data.

That is, a tremendous diminishment of the payload of data speeds up information exchange between a client and a server and cuts down on the use of bandwidth, speeding up how quickly users can load things.

By reducing the overhead of HTTP headers, HPACK helps a lot in the improved efficiency of data transfer with respect to HTTP/2.

Server Push

Server Push is an HTTP/2 feature whereby an HTTP/2 server can proactively push resources to clients without the clients requesting them.

Under traditional HTTP/1.1, when a browser wants to fetch an HTML page, it first parses it and then goes ahead to start asking for more requests to fetch other resources like images, CSS files, and JavaScript.

These techniques bring about latency because every new resource initiates another request. This mechanism allows the server, in HTTP/2, to anticipate what resources a client will need based on an initial request and to send those resources immediately to the client without waiting.

Because these resources are pushed down by the server, this decreases round trips between client and server to retrieve content for a given page, hence speeding page loading and thereby enhancing user experience.

Advantages of server push become more effective in multi-resource or complex web pages.

Stream Prioritization

The main feature that HTTP/2 allows is to prioritize streams within one connection so as to assign various priorities.

On a common web page, there may be resources that are more crucial for quick presentation and can include another set of images or other media files. The paramount resources can be given priority with respect to delivery in HTTP/2.

This prioritization mechanism has improvements over the ordering in which assets are loaded, resulting in fast initial page rendering and hence enhancing perceived performance.

Stream prioritization ensures minimal delay in fetching main parts of a website since it informs the client about what resources are most important.

How HTTP/2 Works?

HTTP/2 works by introducing a much more lightweight and binary protocol that is then used in place of the old text-based style that the HTTP/1.1 used to communicate.

In this most recent version, every communication is divided into small binary-encoded frames, which are sent independently in such a way that data transfer is done in an optimized manner.

These frames are then multiplexed along a single TCP connection, allowing multiple requests and responses to be sent simultaneously without these transmissions having to wait for one another.

This goes a long way toward significantly optimizing how fast a page can load, one of the biggest reasons behind the reduction in latency and achieving a snappier web browsing experience.

Advantages of HTTP/2

Multiplexing

In HTTP/2, multiplexing is supported, meaning that multiple streams of data can be sent on top of one single TCP connection.

This will reduce latency, where the need for more connections is eliminated and avoid head-of-line blocking found in HTTP/1.1, when a single slow request may delay others lined up in the queue.

Header Compression

HTTP/2 uses an efficient compression algorithm, called HPACK, custom-built for compressing HTTP headers. The new technique of sending HTTP headers significantly reduces much of the overhead usually involved in transmitting them.

It is especially the case when a client sends requests that have to repeat some or all of the preceding headers. The use of smaller header sizes brings a faster web page load and considerable reduction of bandwidth consumption during the transmission.

Server Push

The HTTP/2 protocol offers an exciting innovation in the form of server push, whereby the server can actively initiate the sending of resources to the client even without an explicit request on the part of the client for these resources.

Such proactive delivery of resources goes a long way in optimizing the entire process of page loading by reducing the number of round trips that are usually necessary for acquiring all the key resources necessary for complete page rendering.

Stream Prioritization

One of the noteworthy features that came along with the introduction of HTTP/2 is the prioritization of streams by clients, which enabled the client to specify which particular resources are of more importance during the loading process.

This means that vital resources such as essential CSS files or key images which are crucial for visual presentation in a web page should be served first.

As it stands, it will have significantly increased the perceived performance of a website while guaranteeing the most important content is delivered promptly to users.

Binary Protocol

Unlike in other earlier versions, HTTP/2 is a binary protocol and not text-based. That makes it easier and faster to process.

Indeed, binary protocols are much more effective regarding parsing and handling of data than text protocols, which takes less time and resources while sending data and, therefore, enhances the performance.

Disadvantages of HTTP/2

Complexity at Implementation

While HTTP/2 introduces a raft of new features and mechanisms that extend its capabilities, including multiplexing and header compression, it also introduces more complexity in implementation compared to its predecessor, HTTP/1.1.

Due to this increased level of complexity, the implementation and configuration may require more intricate configurations on both the server and client sides, hence requiring careful attention during setup and subsequent management to ensure it works seamlessly.

Increased Resource Utilization

The introduction of HTTP/2, along with its useful features like multiplexing and server push, can have a demanding impact on resource utilization in servers.

The capability to manage multiple concurrent streams at once, while being successful in handling server pushes, might load the resources of your server much more strongly.

This can either demand more powerful hardware or may require further optimizations to work successfully.

Dependency on SSL/TLS

Although HTTP/2 does not explicitly require encryption as a standard practice, the majority of current implementations do, in fact, necessitate the use of SSL/TLS protocols.

This strong reliance on HTTPS presents a significant obstacle for websites that either have not yet integrated support for HTTPS or are looking to bypass it due to concerns related to performance or specific configuration issues.

Risk of Head-of-Line Blocking

Although HTTP/2 has taken an indispensable step forward in eliminating head-of-line blocking through its innovative technique of multiplexing, there is still a good chance that improper implementation or misconfiguration may lead to performance problems.

For instance, not all the implementations of servers or clients could utilize the full potential of the advanced features that the protocol specification applies, which may result in inefficiency and suboptimal performance outcome.

Compatibility Issues

There could be some older systems and network devices that cannot fully support the HTTP/2 protocol or may not manage it efficiently.

This could, therefore, introduce several compatibility issues, especially when there are intermediaries such as proxies or load balancers.

Some of them may fail to offer complete support for HTTP/2, or they could struggle to efficiently handle the traffic that results from it. This would then lead to serious performance degradation or result in functionality problems that would badly affect users.

Use Cases of HTTP/2

Improving Website Load Times

The release of HTTP/2 greatly improved website load times using a feature called multiplexing. In this feature, multiple requests and responses can be sent over a single TCP connection in every direction.

This new functionality reduces latency, the time it takes before data starts being transferred, and it greatly improves resource loading processes’ overall efficiency.

Because of this, users will notice that pages are loading a lot faster, adding to a much better overall experience on the website.

The advantage of such innovative features is more applicable to websites with a large number of small resources, including elements such as images, scripts, and stylesheets.

Optimizing Resource Delivery for Mobile Devices

The use of mobile networks faces the problem of high latency with the unavailability of low bandwidth in many cases.

Advanced capabilities of HTTP/2, including the must-haves like header compression and multiplexing, greatly help in improving the optimization of resource delivery across these constrained and mostly unreliable networks.

Effectively reducing the overhead generally used by handling multiple connections and concurrently reducing the general size of HTTP headers, HTTP/2 contributes much to the faster and efficient loading of mobile websites and applications.

Streaming Media

HTTP/2 allows multiple streams to be handled efficiently, which greatly enhances a wide array of video and audio services included in this category of streaming media platforms.

A process referred to as multiplexing allows for the concurrent sending of different segments of the media, thereby easing buffering issues-a common frustration users face-and greatly enhancing one’s experience while streaming.

Furthermore, HTTP/2 can also facilitate high-quality streaming content at lower latency, leading to higher user satisfaction and better overall viewer or listener experience.

Smoothing Web Application Performance

In web applications relying heavily on a plethora of asynchronous requests-such as SPAs and platforms providing dynamic content-performance can be significantly improved by using HTTP/2. The main advantage of this protocol is support for multiplexing.

This feature allows several resources to be loaded at once and in parallel, without hindering or blocking each other.

This, in the end, leads to much smoother user interactions and considerably faster response times for dynamic web applications, enhancing the overall user experience significantly.

Smoothing E-commerce and High-Traffic Websites

E-commerce websites, among other high-traffic websites, often deal with complex web pages filled with multiple assets.

With HTTP/2, this can dramatically enhance overall performance by virtually reducing the amount of connections needed and accelerating loading tasks for key elements such as product images, scripts, and stylesheets.

For high-traffic sites, this advancement means increased scalability and an overall improvement in user experience, thus driving higher conversion rates and deeper engagement with users.

Future of HTTP Protocols: HTTP/3 and Beyond

HTTP/3 is another evolutionary step in the line of evolution for the HTTP protocol, since it is basically constructed over the QUIC transport layer protocol.

Unlike its predecessors, which have classically utilized the classic TCP-Transmission Control Protocol, HTTP/3 uses QUIC-a protocol layered on UDP, or User Datagram Protocol.

Also Read: What is User Datagram Protocol (UDP)? TCP vs UDP: What’s the Difference

The change in underlying protocol architecture is meant to deal pretty effectively with a raft of shortcomings that are attached by default with TCP, such as a problem well known as head-of-line blocking, besides many others, such as generally slower connection establishment.

With HTTP/3, users will enjoy faster page loading, a distinct reduction in latency, and overall performance improvement, particularly related to secure connections, which are obligatorily required in today’s digital landscape.

Also Read: What Are QUIC and HTTP/3? Benefits and Use Cases of HTTP/3

Moreover, it greatly enhances the possibility of multiplexing-a function that deals with sending many signals or streams of data over one channel.

Improvement in this respect lets packet loss be handled way better, hence overall giving a more robust and efficient browsing experience to users.

Difference Between Http 1.1 vs Http 2 vs Http 3

Feature	HTTP/1.1	HTTP/2	HTTP/3
Introduction Year	1997	2015	2022
Transport Protocol	TCP	TCP	QUIC (UDP)
Multiplexing	No (One request per connection)	Yes (Multiple requests on a single connection)	Yes (More efficient than HTTP/2)
Header Compression	No	Yes (HPACK)	Yes (QPACK)
Security	Optional TLS (HTTPS)	Mandatory TLS (TLS 1.2 & 1.3)	Built-in TLS (TLS 1.3)
Latency	High (Head-of-Line Blocking)	Lower than HTTP/1.1	Lowest (No TCP Handshake)
Connection Handling	Multiple connections needed	Single connection, streams	Faster, with reduced connection setup time
Performance	Slower	Faster page loads	Fastest page loads
Adoption	Widely used but outdated	Widely adopted	Adoption increasing

Conclusion

Discover the power of advanced web protocols and secure your online presence with CheapSSLWEB’s cutting-edge solutions. Whether you’re aiming to enhance your site’s speed with HTTP/2, prepare for the future with HTTP/3, or ensure robust security with us!

Search