(7 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...
Today’s globalized and technologically driven world means that companies must nowadays pay very close attention to protecting their data.
Two critical concepts have emerged as indispensable tools in this quest: There are basic techniques such as asymmetric encryption and digital signatures that have been the foundation of modern cryptography for some time.
Even though both elements are essential in protecting information, they work for different objectives and are based on contrasting principles.
This piece seeks to clarify these two emerging technologies and provide you with insights regarding which one offers the best protection for your business against the increasing threat of cybercrime.
Asymmetric encryption, also known as public-key cryptography, is a method of encrypting data using a pair of mathematically related keys: a public key and a private key which are similar to the public and secret keys used in the traditional RSA technology.
While the public key whose name it has is published to encrypt the information, the private key remains secret and has the responsibility to decrypt the encrypted information.
The process of asymmetric encryption unfolds as follows:
The idea here is that breaking asymmetric encryption is caused by the hardness of deriving the private key from the public key. Using modern computing capabilities, an attacker can try millions of keys per second but cannot open the message with the private key, which means that the transmitted data is secure.
Decision-making is one of the security benefits that are offered by asymmetric encryption since it can be used to encrypt the two different keys and distribute the encrypted keys over the insecure channel.
Any two communicating parties who do not have a priori secret keys or secure channel to negotiate keys, find this protocol especially useful. It also does away with the need for a secure exchange of keys, which can be proved to be complex and susceptible to forgery.
Furthermore, there is an aspect of scalability and flexibility inherent in asymmetric encryption that can be carried out and is much superior to the traditional method of symmetric encryption.
On the other hand, in a symmetric encryption system, all the entities or members must use the same key, and this causes much complexity and insecurity as the participants increase.
Asymmetric encryption also known as public key encryption, means that each party in a communication has a key pair of his own and hence it can work for all parties much better than the symmetric one.
Also Read: Symmetric Encryption vs Asymmetric Encryption
While one of the most common techniques of encryption is applied to mask the content of data during transmission, the use of digital signatures provides a means of authenticating data and checking that it has not been tampered with.
Also Read: Digital Signature vs Digital Certificate
They made it possible to verify that the data has not been changed over time and that it comes from the stated source and therefore introduced a level of credibility and responsibility in digital communications.
Digital signatures also work on asymmetric encryption principles; however, their functions are different from encryption.
Here’s how they work:
If the signature is valid, Bob is indeed safe in the assumption that the message originated from Alice and had not been modified in any way. And, if the signature is wrong, then, it may be concluded that the message was perhaps modified in transit or maybe it has not been sent by Alice at all.
Digital signatures are also capable of providing non-repudiation; once Alice signs a message, she cannot present her key to deny that she signed the said message. This property makes it possible for digital signatures to be handy in legal monetary and financial negotiations, and in any other circumstances that call for credibility and responsibility.
Another main use of digital signatures is that they offer a solution to the problem of a ‘digital envelope’ and prevent the tampering of such files.
In contrast to tweaking a physical document, that can be forged in any manner possible, digital signatures bring a unique certification code or digital fingerprint exclusively linked to the content of the data.
Any further change made to the data content would render the digital signature non-congruent and this would help in quickly identifying any tampering that has been done.
In addition, digital signatures can be employed to encourage the manifestation of a link where a string of progressive signatures on the document or data is looked for.
This is particularly helpful in cases like negotiating orders and sales, distribution, and use of copied software, as well as situations where there is compliance with regulatory frameworks.
Symmetric encryption and hash functions are quite like asymmetric encryption and digital signatures however, they are designed for different purposes and are used in different ways.
Here’s a closer look at the key differences between the two:
As for the difference in the use of asymmetric encryption and digital signatures, while the two differ in functionality, they are commonly used in parallel to ensure a steadfast security solution.
For instance, in secure email communication, while sending the message, it can be encrypted with the public key and to decode it, the private key can be used, thus ensuring that only the recipient can read the content while data integrity can be achieved by using a digital signature for the message.
Symmetric encryption and block ciphering are based on the idea of secret keys, while asymmetric encryption and digital signature both use the concept of public and private keys.
The key among these systems is the private key because its loss can be a major disaster that results in unauthorized deciphering of information or even emulation of the digital signatures.
Effective Key Management involves Several Key Principles:
It is very common to use both asymmetric encryption and digital signatures when addressing real-world scenarios to add layers of protection.
This makes it possible to ensure that both the privacy and the accuracy of the data that is transmitted through the channel are well protected because the technique employs a combination of secure methods.
Here’s how the two technologies can be used together:
With the use of asymmetric encryption, the message is only accessible by the intended recipient and this is protected during the time of transferring it where it cannot be intercepted by others (as explained above) while the digital signature can be used to ensure that the message has not been tampered with or it originated from the sender. This method covers all aspects of security needs; the confidentiality and integrity of data are safeguarded.
Learn about data protection and get familiar with the basic measures that you should take to ensure your digital resources are safe. Discover our wide-ranging catalog of encryption and digital signature solutions to prevent possible risks to your content.
By comparing these two technologies, you will be able to decide on the way to safeguard your critical data, mainly depending on the most efficient features.
Yes, asymmetric encryption and digital signatures are two that follow the same fundamental concept of public-key cryptography.
However, while asymmetric encryption is used to secure the transmission of the data, the digital signatures are used to address the issue of authenticity and data integrity. The purpose and usage vary in the two technologies.
These are the advantages of using symmetric and other disadvantages that are associated with both asymmetric and symmetric systems of encryption.
The key distribution is safer in asymmetric encryption than in symmetric encryption but upon transmission of large data, the aggregated encryption slows down the process.
In real-world applications, it is common to deploy the concept of a combination of both asymmetric and symmetric encryption where key exchange is performed by asymmetric encryption while data encryption is performed symmetrically.
The latter is true because it is virtually impossible to produce a genuine digital signature unless you possess the private key. But if the private key is lost, an attacker could easily fake signatures and signatures could be regarded as inconsequential, as in the essay.
This is why administrators need to be extremely careful when it comes to protecting private keys and have to follow specific guidelines that will help them ensure the security of the key — for example, by using specialized appliances known as hardware security modules (HSMs) and implementing strict access restrictions.
Digital signatures imposed in the legislation of many countries are equal to traditional ones under some conditions, including, for example, the presence of a qualified certificate from a Certificate Authority (CA) or the admissibility of being achieved with the help of an accepted cryptographic algorithm.
That is why digital signatures are commonly used in the spheres of legal services, financial services, and governmental bodies for electronic contracting and document signing.
Yes, asymmetric encryption and digital signatures form good partners in that asymmetric encryption is used in combination with digital signatures to offer clients comprehensive security solutions.
For example, while the data being transmitted over the network needs to be encrypted to ensure confidentiality, asymmetric encryption can be used, on the other hand, the content of the message needs to be verified with a level of certainty, and digital signatures can be used to ensure integrity of the data as well as the confidentiality of the same.
Cheap SSL/TLS Certificates~ Starts at $3.99/yr and Code Signing Certificate ~ Starts at $210.99/yr